I run a hands-on SEO audit of your website: finding technical errors, weak points in structure, content and the backlink profile — and handing you a clear list of priorities for where to start growing traffic.
Positions and traffic have declined with no clear reason — need to determine what's actually holding back growth.
The site has been stagnant for months: traffic isn't dropping, but it isn't growing either, despite investment.
The site was recently launched — it's important to check indexing, structure, and readiness for promotion.
Need an independent assessment of the site's current state and what's already been done vs. what's still broken.
After a CMS, design, or domain change, indexing, redirects, and SEO metrics need to be verified.
An audit helps determine the real scope of work, timeline, and priorities before committing to ongoing promotion.
I check the site's technical condition and issues that may prevent crawling, indexing, and growth.
A prioritized list of technical issues.
I check what search engines actually see — from directive files to the status of individual pages.
A list of pages with indexing issues and recommendations to fix them.
I look at how well the site's logic matches how people actually search for it.
A structure diagram with missing landing pages identified.
I check whether page content matches search queries and isn't working against its own promotion.
A traffic-prioritized list of pages with metadata and content issues.
I assess what on the site influences a user's decision to submit a request instead of going to a competitor.
A list of factors currently reducing conversion from search traffic.
I look at the site in the context of search results: its backlink profile and what's already ranking above it.
A backlink risk assessment and comparison with top-ranking competitors.
Correctness of directives, sitemap freshness, no important sections blocked from indexing.
Which pages are actually indexed and which aren't, and why — checked via webmaster panels and targeted queries.
Matching/duplicate pages, correctness of rel=canonical, www/non-www and http/https versions.
Correctness of 301 redirects, finding unnecessary chains that slow crawling and lose link equity.
Broken internal and external links, incorrect server responses, orphaned pages with no redirect.
Load speed, layout stability, and page responsiveness — based on real-world and lab data.
Uniqueness and relevance of titles and descriptions, match to the page's target queries.
Section logic and nesting depth — how many clicks it takes to reach important pages.
Distribution of link equity between pages, links to priority sections.
Whether the text matches what users are actually searching for with that query.
Presence and correctness of markup — products, reviews, organization, breadcrumbs.
Correct rendering, usability, and load speed on mobile devices.
Contacts, pricing, reviews, trust and other elements that influence user choice.
Quantity and quality of backlinks, risks and suspicious donors.
Comparison with sites already ranking in the top for your target queries.
| Issue | URL | Priority | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Page blocked from indexing | /services/… | Critical | Check robots.txt and meta robots |
| Duplicate Titles | 18 URLs | High | Write unique Titles |
| Redirect chain | /old-page | Medium | Remove the intermediate 301 |
Example report structure. Data shown is for format demonstration only.
Not just a list of errors
You get a structured document that shows:
Not an automated export from a tool — a manual analysis with priorities.
Every technical and content issue found — with specific pages listed.
What to fix first, and what can wait.
Clear actions for each item — no need to decode SEO terminology yourself.
Pages, queries, and directions that can increase organic traffic.
A spec for a developer, content specialist, or contractor for fixes SEO alone can't make.
The sequence of further work, prioritized by impact.
I connect to Yandex Webmaster, Google Search Console, and analytics. Collecting data on the site's current state.
I check the technical side, indexing, structure, content, commercial factors, links, and competitors.
I rank the issues found by their impact on traffic and rankings — from critical to minor.
I put together a clear report with recommendations and discuss the results with you personally.
This is an example of the kind of issues and growth opportunities an SEO audit can reveal. The actual scope of work depends on the site and niche.
Turnaround — 5–7 business days.
Final pricing depends on site size, niche, competition, and depth of review.
No managers, no handoffs between departments — you talk directly to the specialist.
Not an automated report from an SEO tool, but a review that accounts for your business, niche, and search demand.
Recommendations are built for your specific project, not handed to you as a generic list of hundreds of items.
I assess not just whether errors exist, but which of them can actually affect organic traffic.
For a basic review, CMS access usually isn't needed. Access to Google Search Console, Yandex Webmaster, and analytics tools is helpful.
Usually 5–7 business days. For large e-commerce sites and sites with many pages, it can take longer.
No. An SEO audit is a standalone service. You can implement the recommendations yourself or hand them to another contractor.
SEO tasks can be taken on as ongoing work. Changes requiring development are handled separately.
Tools find technical signals. A manual audit determines which issues actually matter for your specific site and prioritizes them.
Yes. In that case the focus shifts to indexing, structure, technical readiness, semantics, and readiness for future promotion.
Order an SEO audit — get a list of issues, growth opportunities, and a prioritized action plan.
